You decide to convince Sarah with math

monochrome photo of math formulas

You can’t let her abuse abstract mathematics like this. Thankfully you are a wiz at debate and quickly think of some obvious issues with her plan.

What argument do you use?

Dini cannot be Paradoxically decomposed when he is already normally decomposing.

The Axiom of choice is a bad assumption?

Wouldn’t applying all of these transforms and resampling just return half of Dini at an atomic level?

I don’t think your 3D printer will be able to sample and recreate the hamster well enough to implement Dini.

The Banach Tarski paradox only works on spheres, the transforms don’t work on hamster shapes

Published by B McGraw

B McGraw has lived a long and successful professional life as a software developer and researcher. After completing his BS in spaghetti coding at the department of the dark arts at Cranberry Lemon in 2005 he wasted no time in getting a masters in debugging by print statement in 2008 and obtaining his PhD with research in screwing up repos on Github in 2014. That's when he could finally get paid. In 2018 B McGraw finally made the big step of defaulting on his student loans and began advancing his career by adding his name on other people's research papers after finding one grammatical mistake in the Peer Review process.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading