You know that the key to the Banach Tarski paradox is to decompose the sampling set and there’s absolutely no way that will work if the body is already decomposing.
“Sarah, you know that if the hamster has been decomposing like bodies do, a set decomposition of a decomposed hamster is still a decomposed hamster. It won’t work, he’ll still be dead.”
“I’ve already thought of that! I got the body on ice, it’s barely decomposed at all. I came in right after Sir Meowsalot made the kill. I clone Dini with the Banach Tarski machine, start the heart with these wires here,” she pointed to some dangly blue and green wires coming out of her raspberry pi, “I’ve looked it up on a reddit thread, it works three times out of ten but with an infinite amount of Dini bodies, it’s eventually going to work!”
You’re not sure if that would even still work or how reliable a reddit thread is on bringing pets back to life, but Sarah is unconvinced of your critique.
The Axiom of choice is a bad assumption?
The Banach Tarski paradox only works on spheres, the transforms don’t work on hamster shapes