Site icon Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology

This would only work on a sphere because of the way the points shift

You know well enough about the paradox to know that their transforms are very specifically for a sphere and any irregular shape will not work.

“Doesn’t the Banach paradox transformation only work for spheres? It’s a very particular set of sets that’s able to reconstruct based off of angular transforms mapping to another set. I’m sorry but Dini is not a perfect sphere, I don’t think the math will work.”

Sarah laughs shortly, “Ha, have you seen Dini, he’s practically a perfect sphere, we just never had the heart to cut back on his food so he just ballooned to the size he is right now, probably why he couldn’t outrun Sir Meowsalot, bless his heart.”

She was right, Dini was pretty round for a hamster.

Sarah added “I mean, not a perfect sphere but I imagine the cloned version’s just going to be a little lopsided and I’m confident we can come up with a clever transform that’ll take his shape into account.”

She’s still unconvinced. What do you do?

Dini cannot be Paradoxically decomposed when he is already normally decomposing.

The Axiom of choice is a bad assumption?

Wouldn’t applying all of these transforms and resampling just return half of Dini at an atomic level?

I don’t think your 3D printer will be able to sample and recreate the hamster well enough to implement Dini.

Fine, you give up, help her

Exit mobile version